icon

Official website of the U.S. government

Skip to main content

There’s a cliff that so many of our families are standing on. They are staring down at the edge and one small thing could be just enough to throw them over.

— Frontline Staff

Where we are

Millions of American families face financial shocks every year like an unexpected medical bill, the loss of income, a raise in rent, or loans coming out of deferment.

As a result of a tangled web of information about services, burdensome application processes, and payment systems, many families miss out on getting critical support to re-establish financial stability. More than a quarter of eligible people facing a financial shock receive no help from any Federally funded program, and Benefits Data Trust estimates that across just five programs, more than $60 billion/year in benefits are unclaimed1. And even for the families that do get access to benefits, millions waste countless hours and miss important days of work getting the help they qualify for and need. Transitioning to better jobs often requires training and gaining new skills, but this can be difficult for people to manage while still working to cover day-to-day essentials.

 

Of Americans who face a financial shock, 38% of Americans would face difficulty absorbing an emergency expense of $400.2

1 in 4 workers rely on safety net benefits at some point each year.3

1 Source: Benefits Data Trust

2 Source: Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2021, Federal Reserve

3 Source: The State of Financial Security, Aspen Institute

Challenge
How might we better design access to available supports to meet urgent needs and transition to long-term stability?


Our approach

To start, we listened to people’s stories.

The Life Experience research team spoke with people nationwide about this moment in their lives and where the government process could have been simpler and more helpful. The listening sessions captured honest conversations about peoples' experiences, candid feedback on what could have worked better, and what really made a difference for them. Their stories have been combined and are represented here through illustrations. The quotes are real, but names have been changed.


Jordan
Recently laid off from waiting tables
Single dad
Renter

Alina
Gig worker
Car owner
Delivery driver

Elise
Employed as a dishwasher
Recent widow
Mother of four


 

The team conducted interviews in-person, virtually, in English, and in Spanish. Participants included people nine states and territories who represent a variety of life experiences—including those vulnerable to shocks, such as low-wage workers.

The team spoke with:

  • 61 members of the public
  • 12 frontline staff
  • 17 state/program administrators
  • 33 subject matter experts

Discovery insights

Framing for collective thinking about customer pain points

How might we improve people’s experience navigating and applying for different benefits at the same time to increase awareness, avoid confusion and redundancy, thereby improving efficiency for both program administrators and customers?

How might we encourage states and localities to use their federal funds to help people more quickly re-establish stability with available resources, and design with the most common financial shocks that may occur in mind?

How might we think about recovery and resiliency to include how we empower people through career transitions to better jobs and lasting stability?

Design Phase

Designing customer-centered solutions

View progress on our milestones

In the 2024 design phase, the portfolio is running two pilot projects:

  • Improving data services for benefits delivery is running two sub-projects. Income verification pilots will design and test concepts for income verification improvements. Medicaid renewals state technical assistance will continue supporting states to provide rapid response technical assistance.
  • Supporting States to streamline access to benefits will continue working with 20 States and non-profit organizations to develop cross-program policy tools, guidance, and resources to support State benefits delivery transformation efforts.

This project aims to improve automated benefit determinations for people facing a financial shock by improving underlying Federal data infrastructure.

The work involves identifying income verification models and pilot-testing potential improvements with select states.

Project objectives

Develop and pilot improvements for benefits-related income verification determinations for benefits programs, focusing on income verification strategies that pose no or minimal burden to program applicants and participants in Medicaid, SNAP, and TANF and are affordable for states.

Updates

Income verification for means-tested public benefit programs are often complex manual processes that impose a “time tax” on the enrollees and create administrative burden for state employees. Income data is often missing, stale, or inaccurate leading to state programs requiring applicants to manually submit documentation such as paystubs to verify income. To address these challenges, the team is piloting an “income verification as a service” solution that seeks to improve income verification for means-tested programs using a consent-based verification tool. Early testing of a minimum viable product prototype has shown promising results, including reduced time for individuals to complete income verification and decreased caseworker workload. The team is continuing the pilots and evaluating the results.

See the 2024 project evaluation plan to learn about the project measures and methods.

Measures of success

Key outcomes:

Successfully improving data services will decrease the time needed for benefits eligibility determinations, improve benefit verification (by increasing automatic verifications and the quality of the source data), increase sharing of data or supporting systems for eligibility determinations, and decrease the manual burden on applicants.

Design phase project measures:

Project Documentation

Project Outputs

Agency collaborators

  • General Services Administration (GSA)
  • Department of Labor (DOL)
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
  • Department of Agriculture (USDA)
  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
  • Department of Education (ED)
  • Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)
  • U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
  • Social Security Administration (SSA)